July 16, 2025: The Water Cost of Electricity on the Susquehanna River

May 15, 2025: Data Centers and Nuclear Power on the Susquehanna River: More Questions than Answers

Sep 29, 2024: The case against restarting Three Mile Island’s Unit-1


Radioactive: The Women of Three Mile Island

Did you catch "The Meltdown: Three Mile Island" on Netflix?
TMI remains a danger and TMIA is working hard to ensure the safety of our communities and the surrounding areas.
Learn more on this site and support our efforts. Join TMIA. To contact the TMIA office, call 717-233-7897.

    

PJM tries to ease threats to grid from supersize data centers

By PETER BEHR | 09/17/2025 06:21 AM EDT 
 
Under the proposal, the mid-Atlantic grid would turn off power to data centers before ordering rolling blackouts in an emergency.
 
Data centers are in Ashburn in Loudon County, Virginia, on July 16, 2023. The centers house the computer servers and hardware required to support modern internet use, including artificial intelligence. Ted Shaffrey/AP
The potential threat to grid reliability from supersize AI data centers has grid operators searching hard for answers, with the latest initiative a new policy proposal from PJM Interconnection, the largest U.S. regional power market.
 
The PJM proposal would impact large new data center operations that are not using energy they have developed or acquired. Under emergency situations, PJM operators would cut off power to these data centers first, before ordering rolling blackouts at utilities or other responses.
 
The same issue confronts grid operators across the United States. PJM’s response stands out because its 13-state region, with 67 million customers, is the nation’s largest, and it hosts “data center alley” in northern Virginia, by far the largest U.S. concentration of the data farm installations.
 
Advertisement
 
The North American Electric Reliability Corp., the interstate grid’s security monitor, has a top-level planning committee developing policy proposals for managing data center challenges.
 
“There is already evidence that large loads impact bulk [wholesale power] system reliability,” NERC said in a committee report in July, citing grid disruptions in Virginia and Texas. NERC’s follow-up report with action proposals is scheduled for release later this year.
 
PJM’s policy welcomes the data center boom, joining President Donald Trump and the leadership of the power sector. PJM says it aims to enable “new large loads to connect as rapidly as possible and at the same time determine a plan for how reliability is maintained.”
 
The proposal would keep PJM from having to increase the system’s capacity to meet the peak demand from new data centers. But data centers that didn’t, or couldn’t, acquire enough generation to run their operations would face a risk of unpredictable power cutoffs when the PJM grid is stressed.
 
The proposal does not speak directly to a second critical issue stemming from the AI data center shock wave — how the plan will deal with the rapid increase in utility bills triggered by the data center’s power demands, said Tom Rutigliano, senior advocate for climate and energy at the Natural Resources Defense Council.
 
“Forecasts for data center growth far exceed the rate PJM can add power plants,” NRDC said in a statement Monday. The increased power demand is expected to continue inflating electricity prices now, with faster acceleration beginning in mid-July 2028, NRDC said.
 
NRDC stated, “PJM’s plan aims to prevent blackouts, but fails to protect consumers from ever-increasing bills. Electricity costs in the region are up $12 billion this year alone.
 
“Based on calculations by NRDC using PJM data, under PJM’s plan the public will pay over $20 billion every year from 2028 through at least 2032 as forecast data centers continue to drive up prices,” according to NRDC. “This adds up to a $100 billion or higher bill over this period paid by PJM residents. Virtually all of this will be windfall payments to existing power plants rather than investment in new ones.”
 
Rutigliano said NRDC cost figures derive from existing formulas that PJM uses to establish “capacity” payments in annual auctions. These payments to power plant operators are to incentivize enough generation to keep operating to cover expected power demands in future years. They are ultimately paid by utility customers.
 
NRDC’s calculation assumes that increasing data center power demand will keep capacity prices at established ceiling prices, he added.
 
PJM’s proposal will be open for discussion by PJM’s membership, with a final plan expected to be submitted by this December to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for approval. PJM aims to have it in effect for the capacity auction to secure power supply for the mid-2028 to mid-2029.
 
“To PJM credit, they’re grappling with the problem,” Rutigliano said.
 
“PJM’s proposal is very much a work in progress, and is expected to change,” said PJM senior communications manager Jeffrey Shields. “PJM received significant feedback from stakeholders and is willing to evolve its proposal, drop elements altogether and incorporate entirely new frameworks into its proposal that are proposed by other stakeholders.”
 
“If we do nothing, there is definitely a higher risk of reliability issues including power outages,” Shields added.

US studies show 2050 cost forecasts for solar, wind and batteries far too high

For years, US solar insiders have watched cost forecasts miss the mark. Now, new research confirms what industry trends already made clear by 2023: most 2050 projections for solar, wind, and batteries weren’t even in the same ballpark.

 

Image: Pexels, Kelly CC SA 4.0

From pv magazine USA

Researchers have found that historic projections of solar and energy storage costs have consistently underestimated the pace of price declines. In the study “Are we too pessimistic? Cost projections for solar photovoltaics, wind power, and batteries are over-estimating actual costs globally,” the authors reveal that about half of 2050 cost projections are already on par with today’s prices.

One particularly gobsmacking finding: some 2050 forecasts for utility-scale solar capital expenditures (CAPEX) overshoot today’s market prices by 30%.

In the chart below, the solid black line labeled “Actual CAPEX” represents 2023 values of roughly $500/kW. The surrounding projection lines, which stretch to 2050, show that half of the studies forecast prices above that level, and half below.

It has long been a running joke in the solar industry that the International Energy Agency (IEA) repeatedly underestimates global solar growth. There’s even a now-famous chart lampooning a decade of missed IEA forecasts. The agency’s chronically befuddled outlook reflects its long-standing historical alignment with legacy energy sectors: oil, gas, and coal.

But even within the solar sector, there’s a tendency to temper expectations. Forecasters often strive to appear measured and mature, sometimes to a fault. Wood MacKenzie is known for publishing cautious solar projections, only to revise them upward the following year. BloombergNEF tends to get the trajectory right but still undershoots on volume, with first-quarter forecasts averaging about 10% below actual deployment since 2011.

The researchers compare hardware pricing and levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) projections from 40 studies and 150 scenarios across utility-scale solar photovoltaics, rooftop solar, onshore and offshore wind, and lithium-ion batteries.

As the chart above shows, a few studies managed to track the decline in utility-scale solar prices from 2020 to 2022, but none foresaw the steep plunge that followed the collapse in polysilicon prices as COVID-era supply chains recovered.

One example of this widening “Overton pricing window” comes from the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), which houses some of the most respected solar experts in the country.

“The 2015 ATB report from the NREL estimated the average LCOE for utility-scale PV to be $91/MWh (2024 USD) in the year 2050. Conversely, the latest report from 2024 anticipated an average of $21/MWh (2024 USD) for the same year, a 77% reduction.”

In a separate section, the authors cite similar shifts in projected capex:

“The 2015 ATB estimated the average CAPEX for utility-scale PV to be $1500/kW (2024 USD) in the year 2050. Conversely, the latest report from 2024 anticipated an average of $700/kW (2024 USD) for the same year, a 53% cost reduction.”

That’s more than a 50% drop in the capital required to deploy smarter, longer-lasting hardware, alongside a 77% reduction in its projected cost of electricity. In both cases, long-range projections meant to stretch across 35 years were met and surpassed in less than 10.

For lithium-ion batteries, the story is similar, except we’re still in the steepest and most exciting part of the price declines.

The chart above shows that projections for lithium-ion storage in the 2010s quickly fell behind reality. Prices dropped from $450/kWh to around $175/kWh by 2020, while the most optimistic projections still placed costs around $250/kWh. The data, collected through 2024, show that real-world price declines continue to outpace forecasts.

As usual, long-range forecasts tend to flatten out. Most 2050 forecasts cluster across a wide range of $60-$360/kWh, even though recent bids for near-term projects are already coming in at or below $60/kWh.

It’s tempting to assume that these steep price declines must slow soon. But that assumption keeps being wrong.

How much solar power will be installed in 2025? What about 2026? Despite growing evidence of rapid acceleration, many forecasts continue to lowball solar’s trajectory. The IEA once claimed 600 GW of solar per year was needed to meet climate goals—a target that was met last year. Bloomberg initially projected 700 GW for 2025 but has since revised that number upward. Some analysts now believe global installations could reach 1 TW next year, though caution still prevails in many models.

Efficiency gains may soon become the dominant path to lower LCOE. Li Zhenguo, founder and former CEO of Longi Green, sees the potential for perovskite-silicon tandem cells to reach 44% efficiency. He also noted that every 1% increase in module efficiency results in roughly a 5% reduction in LCOE.

To put that in context: if a 2022 LCOE for utility-scale solar was around $50/MWh using panels with around 22% efficiency, a shift to 43% efficient tandem modules could push LCOE down to $17/MWh.

Dear Indian Point Trackers,

Also

https://www.aol.com/news/10b-plan-could-restart-indian-174500560.html

 

$10B Plan Could Restart Indian Point Nuclear Plant In Buchanan, Company Says: Report

Several years after ending operations, the Indian Point nuclear plant in the Hudson Valley could still be restarted, but it would take billions of dollars, according to a new report by Politico. Kelly Trice, the President of Holtec International, which is in charge of dismantling the facility, told…

www.aol.com

 

https://northcountrynow.com/stories/hochul-calls-on-feds-to-fast-track-plans-for-nuclear-facility,322642

 

Hochul calls on feds to fast-track plans for nuclear facility

MASSENA -- Governor Kathy Hochul has instructed New York Power Authority officials to build a facility to produce one gigawatt of additional power to meet her state emissions goals but federal roadblocks may slow the process. In response, Hochul said she is appealing to President Donald Trump to fast-track the process so a nuclear facility comes online faster. At a recent press event, Hochul ...

northcountrynow.com

N2
MJK

 NEWS FROM BEYOND NUCLEAR


  For immediate release 

  Contact: Kevin Kamps, radioactive waste specialist, Beyond Nuclear, Kalamazoo, MI, (240) 462-3216, kevin@beyondnuclear.org

  Michael Keegan, chair, Don’t Waste Michigan, Monroe, MI, mkeeganj@comcast.net

Terry Lodge, attorney, Toledo, OH, tjlodge50@yahoo.com

Wallace Taylor, attorney, Cedar Rapids, IA, wtaylor784@aol.com

Arnie Gundersen, nuclear engineer/expert witness, (802) 238-4452

 

Environmentalists' Expert Witness Warns NRC of Yet More Cracking in Palisades Atomic Reactor's Primary Coolant System

Nuclear Engineer Arnie Gundersen Fears Steam Generator Tubes and Tube Sheets May Fail Within Six Months

COVERT TWP., MI and WASHINGTON, D.C., SEPTEMBER 10, 2025--Arnold Gundersen, a nuclear engineer with more than 50 years of relevant experience who serves as expert witness for an environmental coalition opposing Holtec International’s unprecedented restart of the previously closed Palisades atomic reactor, has sent an open letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)

Gundersen invoked the safety engineers who warned in 1986 that the cold temperature launch of the Space Shuttle Challenger was not safe, but were nonetheless overruled by NASA superiors more concerned about meeting the arbitrary launch schedule, with catastrophic consequences.

Gundersen wrote “Never in my 54-year professional career have I been more concerned about the integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary than I am about the condition of Palisades.”

Gundersen added: “My concern initially started with the condition of the steam generators, but new Holtec relief requests have identified significant PWSCC [Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking] at eight other locations within the reactor coolant system.  The loss of the reactor coolant pressure boundary can lead to previously unimaginable impacts to the general public. I respectfully suggest that the ACRS imagine what could happen in the event of primary coolant system failure or a steam generator tube failure due to years of improper wet layup by Holtec at Palisades.  I pray that you will thoroughly question the integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary caused by failure to meet Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) primary and secondary water chemistry standards before allowing Palisades to restart and set a new licensing precedent.”

The letter warns against inadequate analysis of steam generator tube degradation, the safety risk that has dominated attention for the past year. But Gundersen also warns about an additional degradation mechanism, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking (PWSCC), only recently revealed by Holtec, which appears to have impacted multiple locations in Palisades’ Primary Coolant System, also vitally important for safety.

Gundersen added “[t]his is a generic issue, as there are other decommissioned reactors now in the queue to be resurrected that have also not maintained adequate water chemistry during closure.”

Constellation Energy at Three Mile Island Unit 1 in Pennsylvania, and NextEra at Duane Arnold in Iowa, are following Palisades’ closed reactor restart precedent.

As cited by the NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB), “Wet layup consists of filling the steam generator completely with water that has been treated with hydrazine and ammonium hydroxide. The high steam generator level minimizes the amount of secondary metal that [sic] exposed to air during cold shutdown.” (United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Technical Training Center, Combustion Engineering Technology Cross Training Course Systems Manual at 2.3.9.1, Sept. 19, 2002, ADAMS Accession No. ML022840127; see footnote #59, on Page 14, of ASLB’s August 5, 2025 ruling.)

Gundersen has dubbed Holtec’s 2022-2024 neglect of such basic safety maintenance as taking precautions against corrosive chemical attack on vulnerable steam generator tubes as a “rookie error” that risks a reactor core meltdown, if enough cracked tubes fail in rapid, cascading succession.

Gundersen has warned the ACRS that “[i]t is not clear that the steam generator (SG) tubes or the SG tube sheet will survive for even half a year after Palisades’ ‘resurrection’ — Holtec’s word choice — is complete.” 

Gundersen also warned that in the event of even a single steam generator tube’s failure, “Palisades’ 60-year old design would use Atmospheric Dumps to discharge hazardous radioactivity directly into the atmosphere.”

Gundersen added: “Now, new information of degradation has become available. In addition to all the steam generator tube and tube sheet indications, on August 20, 2025 Holtec filed a series of relief requests (ML25232A195) indicating that it has discovered Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking (PWSCC) in numerous dissimilar metal welds in Palisades’ Primary Coolant System. The affected welds include indications in two hot leg welds, four cold leg welds and two pressurizer welds.”

Gundersen concluded: “Holtec has previously admitted that it did not analyze either primary or secondary water chemistry at Palisades for two years and that it was not in compliance with EPRI water quality guidelines.  Clearly the absence of adequate water chemistry control at Palisades and its effect on the primary coolant system boundary are issues that deserve the thorough attention of the ACRS before allowing Palisades to restart.” 

NRC staff and ASLB panels have already signed off on most, although not all, required approvals for Holtec to restart Palisades, perhaps yet this year the company still claims. This is despite the environmental coalition’s efforts to challenge safety shortcomings at every twist and turn in the ASLB proceedings for the past two years. ACRS sign off is among the very last hurdles before Holtec’s Palisades restart is officially approved by NRC, as is final approval by the NRC Commissioners. The agency’s normally five — but currently three — directors have yet to rule on the environmental coalition’s many appeals of adverse ASLB rulings, regarding multiple Holtec License Amendment Requests, an Exemption Request, a License Transfer Request, and the adequacy of agency environmental reviews, all of which the coalition has contested. 

The intervening coalition includes Beyond Nuclear, Don’t Waste Michigan, Michigan Safe Energy Future, Nuclear Energy Information Service of Chicago, and Three Mile Island Alert of Pennsylvania. The coalition’s co-counsel are Terry Lodge of Toledo, Ohio, and Wallace Taylor of Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Dr. Mark Z. Jacobson, Stanford University professor and author of a large number of technical publications on reducing greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming and climate change, also serves as an environmental coalition expert witness opposed to Holtec’s Palisades restart scheme.

For more information, see Beyond Nuclear’s “Newest Nuke Nightmares at Palisades, 2022 to Present” — a one-stop-shop of web posts dating back to April 2022, when Holtec CEO Krishna Singh first floated “Small Modular Reactor” construction and operation at Palisades, and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer first floated restarting the closed-for-good reactor.

###
SUN DAY CAMPAIGN  
8606 Greenwood Avenue, Suite #2; Takoma Park, MD 20912-6656  

   

Brief News Update & Analysis  

91% OF NEW U.S. ELECTRICAL CAPACITY
IN THE FIRST HALF OF 2025 WAS SOLAR AND WIND
 
IN JUNE, SOLAR WAS THE LARGEST SOURCE 
OF NEW GENERATING CAPACITY 
FOR THE 22nd CONSECUTIVE MONTH
 
RENEWABLES ON TRACK TO EXCEED 40% OF TOTAL
GENERATING CAPACITY WITHIN THREE YEARS

 

For Release:  Wednesday, September 3, 2025 

Contact:         Ken Bossong, 301-588-4741

 
Washington DC – A review by the SUN DAY Campaign of data just released by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) reveals that the combination of solar and wind accounted for 91% of new U.S. electrical generating capacity added in the first half of 2025. In June, solar alone provided 82% of new capacity, making it the 22nd consecutive month in which solar has held the lead among all energy sources.
 
 
Solar was 82% of new generating capacity in June and 75% in the first half of 2025:
 
In its latest monthly “Energy Infrastructure Update” report (with data through June 30, 2025), FERC says 63 “units” of solar totaling 2,439 megawatts (MW) were placed into service in June, accounting for over 81.5% of all new generating capacity added during the month.
 
The new facilities include six solar farms with capacities of 199-MW or more: the 417.7-MW Ash Creek Solar Project and the 206.1-MW Mercury Solar & Storage Project both in Hill County, TX; the 300-MW Box Canyon Solar Project in Pinal County, AZ; the 250-MW Morris Solar Project in Adair County, MO; the 200.0-MW Big Star Solar & Storage Project in Bastrop County, TX; and the 199.0-MW Speedway Solar Project in Shelby County, IN.
 
The 14,567-MW of utility-scale (i.e., >1-MW) solar added during the first six months of 2025 was almost three-quarters (74.9%) of the total new capacity placed into service by all sources.
 
Solar has now been the largest source of new generating capacity added each month for twenty-two consecutive months: September 2023 – June 2025. During that period, total utility-scale solar capacity grew from 91.82 gigawatts (GW) to 151.73-GW. No other energy source added anything close to that amount of new capacity. Wind, for example, expanded by 10.53-GW while natural gas increased by just 2.73-GW.
 
 
Solar, wind and biomass were over 91% of new capacity added in the first half of 2025:
 
Between January and June, new wind has provided 3,139-MW of capacity additions – almost double the new capacity provided by natural gas (1,727-MW). Wind thus accounted for 16.1% of all new capacity added during the first six months of 2025. In June alone, the 144.0-MW Crossover Wind Project in Cross County, AR came on-line along with the 58.8-MW Moscow Wind Power Project in Somerset County, ME.
 
For the first half of 2025, the combination of solar and wind (plus 3-MW of biomass) was 91.04% of new capacity while natural gas provided just 8.88%; the balance came from oil (14-MW).
 
 
Solar + wind are almost a quarter of U.S. utility-scale generating capacity; all renewables combined are nearly a third:
 
Utility-scale solar’s share of total installed capacity of (11.34%) is now almost equal to that of wind (11.83%). Taken together, they constitute nearly one-fourth (23.17%) of the U.S.’s total available installed utility-scale generating capacity.
 
Moreover, at least 25-30% of U.S. solar capacity is in the form of small-scale (e.g., rooftop) systems that are not reflected in FERC’s data. [1] Including that additional solar capacity would bring the share provided by solar + wind to more than a quarter of the nation’s total.
 
With the inclusion of hydropower (7.62%), biomass (1.07%) and geothermal (0.31%), renewables currently claim a 32.17% share of total U.S. utility-scale generating capacity. If small-scale solar capacity is included, renewables are now about one-third of total U.S. generating capacity.
 
 
Solar remains on track to become the second largest source of U.S. generating capacity:
 
FERC reports that net “high probability” additions of solar between July 2025 and June 2028 total 92,660-MW – an amount more than four times the forecast net “high probability” additions for wind (23,136-MW), the second fastest growing resource. Notably, FERC’s most recent three-year forecasts for growth by both solar and wind are the highest they have been thus far in 2025.
 
FERC also foresees net growth for hydropower (583-MW) and geothermal (92-MW) but a decrease of 131-MW in biomass capacity.
 
Taken together, the net new “high probability” capacity additions by all renewable energy sources over the next three years - i.e., the bulk of the Trump Administration’s remaining time in office - would total 116,340-MW.  
 
On the other hand, there is no new nuclear capacity in FERC’s three-year forecast while coal and oil are projected to contract by 25,017-MW and 1,572-MW respectively. Natural gas capacity would expand by 8,748-MW.
 
Adjusting for the different capacity factors of gas (59.7%), wind (34.3%), and utility-scale solar (23.4%), electricity generated by the projected new solar capacity to be added in the coming three years would be more than four times greater than that produced by the new natural gas capacity while the electrical output by the new wind capacity would be 52% more than that by gas. [2]
 
If FERC’s current “high probability” additions materialize, by July 1, 2028, solar will account for over one-sixth (17.1%) of the nation’s installed utility-scale generating capacity. Wind would provide an additional one-eighth (12.6%) of the total. Thus, each would be greater than coal (12.1%) and substantially more than either nuclear power or hydropower (7.3% and 7.1% respectively).
 
Assuming current growth rates continue, the installed capacity of utility-scale solar is likely to surpass that of wind capacity this year and exceed that of coal by the end of next year. Installed solar capacity is already almost 50% greater than that of nuclear power. Thus, within two years, solar should be in second place for installed generating capacity – behind only natural gas.
 
 
The combined capacities of all renewables, including small-scale solar, could overtake natural gas within three years:
 
The mix of all utility-scale renewables is now adding about two percentage points each year to its share of generating capacity. At that pace, by July 1, 2028, renewables would account for over three-eighths (38.1%) of total available installed utility-scale generating capacity - rapidly closing the gap with natural gas (40.0%). Solar and wind would constitute more than three-quarters of the installed capacity of renewable sources. If those trendlines continue, utility-scale renewable energy capacity should surpass that of natural gas in 2029 or sooner.
 
However, as noted, FERC’s data do not account for the capacity of small-scale solar systems. If that is factored in, within three years, total U.S. solar capacity (i.e., small-scale plus utility-scale) could approach 350-GW. In turn, the mix of all renewables would then be about 40% of total installed capacity - or more - while natural gas’ share would drop to about 38%.
 
Moreover, FERC reports that there may actually be as much as 230,770-MW of net new solar additions in the current three-year pipeline in addition to 68,627-MW of new wind, 7,923-MW of new hydropower, 202-MW of new geothermal, and 27-MW of new biomass. By contrast, net new natural gas capacity potentially in the three-year pipeline totals just 30,251-MW. Consequently, renewables’ share could be even greater by early summer 2028.
 
 
Evidence of the energy transition grows stronger as renewables’ share of generating capacity continues to increase while that of fossil fuels and nuclear power shrinks:
 
A year ago, the mix of all renewables accounted for 29.95% of total generating capacity. Solar alone was 8.99% while wind was 11.75%. Over the course of twelve months - i.e., by the end of June 2025 - renewables’ share had risen to 32.17% with solar at 11.34% and wind at 11.83%.
 
On the other hand, natural gas’ share had slipped from 43.32% to 42.34% as coal fell from 15.76% to 14.82% and oil dropped from 2.77% to 2.71%. Similarly, nuclear power’s share of generating capacity decreased from 8.04% to 7.80%.  
 
 
"Notwithstanding the hostility towards solar and wind shown by the Trump Administration and its Republican supporters in Congress, both technologies are moving full-speed ahead," noted the SUN DAY Campaign's executive director Ken Bossong. "In fact, FERC’s latest data suggest growth by renewables may actually be accelerating." 
  
# # # # # # # # #  
   
Sources:  
FERC's 7-page "Energy Infrastructure Update for June 2025" was posted on September 2, 2025. It can be found at: https://cms.ferc.gov/media/energy-infrastructure-update-june-2025.
 
For the information cited in this update, see the tables entitled "New Generation In-Service (New Build and Expansion)," "Total Available Installed Generating Capacity," and "Generation Capacity Additions and Retirements."
 
Notes:   
[1] In a September 12, 2023 news release, EIA stated: “More than one-third of U.S. solar power capacity is small-scale solar. … We expect small-scale solar capacity … will grow from 44-GW in June 2023 to 55-GW by the end of 2024.”
 
[2] Generating capacity is not the same as actual generation. Fossil fuels and nuclear power usually have higher "capacity factors" than do wind and solar. The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reports capacity factors in calendar year 2024 for nuclear power, combined-cycle natural gas plants and coal were 92.3%, 59.7%, and 42.6% respectively while those for wind and utility-scale solar PV were 34.3% and 23.4%. See Tables 6.07.A and 6.07.B in EIA's most recent "Electric Power Monthly" report. 

 
# # # # # # # # # 
   
The SUN DAY Campaign is a non-profit research and educational organization founded in 1992 to support a rapid transition to 100% reliance on sustainable energy technologies as a cost-effective alternative to nuclear power and fossil fuels and as a solution to climate change.
Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 - Initial Operator Licensing Examination Report 05000277/2025301 and 05000278/2025301
 
ADAMS Accession No. ML25240A003
 

Westinghouse welcomes NRC's licensing extension

Wednesday, 27 August 2025
 
The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission has revised the duration of its licensing design certifications from 15 years to 40 years, with Westinghouse's AP1000 approval now extended to 2046.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission noted that the change means "companies applying to build and operate reactors will have more time to reference already-certified designs by GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy, NuScale Power, Westinghouse Electric Company, and a Korean consortium. This change maintains our focus on safety with less regulatory effort and gives designers more time to gather operating experience before asking to renew a certification".

Design certifications are licensing approvals showing that a generic nuclear power plant design passes regulatory and safety requirements and is suitable to be built in the USA. Individual projects still have to get the usual site-specific permissions. The change will be effective from 15 September.

The Westinghouse AP1000 gained its original design certification in 2006 so the extension means that the design remains licensed, which will help with the overall permissions process for any proposed new units in the USA.

Dan Lipman, President, Westinghouse Energy Systems, said: "The expansion of the AP1000 design certification to 40 years further positions the advanced AP1000 modular reactor as the leading solution to meet the bold vision of the US to have 10 large-scale reactors under construction by 2030. In addition, the extension establishes a long-term licensing path to deploy our AP1000 technology abroad by providing international regulators with an established design that has already met rigorous safety standards."

The NRC's full list of design certifications it has issued comprises:

* Advanced Boiling Water Reactor (ABWR) - General Electric (GE) Nuclear Energy

* Advanced Power Reactor 1400 (APR1400) - Korea Electric Power Corporation and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd.

* ABWR Design Certification Rule (DCR) Amendment - South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company

* System 80+ - Westinghouse Electric Company

* Advanced Passive 600 (AP600) - Westinghouse Electric Company

* Advanced Passive 1000 (AP1000) - Westinghouse Electric Company

* Economic Simplified Boiling-Water Reactor (ESBWR) - GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy

* NuScale Small Modular Reactor (US600) - NuScale Power, LLC

Image description

 
 

The Summer 2025 edition of the Nukewatch Quarterly is now ready for viewing online! Click here to read the whole newsletter "cover to cover" on our website!



If you'd like to help keep Nukewatch going, please consider a small donation.

Donate

Uranium Found in Bones of Fallujah Survivors - U.S. Depleted Uranium Munitions Blamed

Image description

A new study reports that among people who returned to bombarded homes and neighborhoods in Fallujah, Iraq, following the 2003 U.S. bombardment and invasion, bone sampling detected uranium in the bones of 29% of study participants.

Read More

Follow us on Facebook and Instagram!

Facebook
   
Instagram
 

Our mailing address is:
Nukewatch
740A Round Lake Road
Luck, WI 54853

Heart of energy in Europe is not in Europe — This country hides 3,500,000 solar panels

by Anke E.   August 22, 2025  in Energy


There is a country that is home to the world’s most ancient known human settlement, as well as one of the oldest sweets in the world. It has also been the center of many debates, for a reason you will understand soon. It also homes the heart of energy in Europe, but it is not in Europe. The country capitalizes on its 3,500,000 hidden solar panels. Not only is it one of the biggest facilities in the world, but it is also one of the most innovative and uniquely designed facilities in the world.

One of the world’s largest hidden solar facilities

Humans, as a species, are naturally wired to be competitive, even when we are striving towards a common goal. Many nations across the world have signed the Paris Agreement to showcase their dedication to mitigating the effects of climate change. However, this noble joint attempt has resulted in many countries competing to come out on top as global leaders in renewable energies.

Solar power has been at the lead in installed renewable capacity globally, especially as many countries have set their own goals of increasing installed solar capacity by 2030, as per the International Energy Agency. The reason for this is solar’s versatile applications, which include, but are not limited to:

  • Utility-scale plants
  • Small-scale residential applications
  • Small-scale commercial applications

There is one country that has piqued our interest, as it has one of the biggest solar facilities in the world, and the biggest in Europe, but the facility itself is not in Europe.

It is Europe’s largest facility, but it is not in Europe

This solar facility comprises a vast area of solar panels. It also houses a central control building for Kalyon Energy, which is extremely unique, as it is covered in a facade of reflective solar panels, hiding the entire building between Earth and sky. There are nearly 3.5 million solar panels spanning an area of nearly 20 million square meters. The facility’s construction kicked off in August 2020, and within three years, it reached full operational capacity.

This impressive facility is called Kalyon Karapınar Solar Power Plant, and is located in the desert region of Karapınar, Turkey. This is where debate always starts. Turkey is geographically situated in both Europe and Asia; however, Karapınar is in Asia, more specifically the central region of Anatolia, as per Britannica. This marks Asia as a “top dog” in solar capacity, as we recall that China has carpeted the mountains in solar panels.

The heart of energy is about so much more than just power

Now, Kalyon Karapınar is massive and powerful. According to Kalyon’s website, the facility produces almost 3 billion kWh of power annually, which is enough clean energy for 2 million people. It has also significantly boosted Türkiye’s solar energy capacity by 15%. This capacity is reportedly the equivalent of removing nearly 1.7 million annual carbon emissions.

Additional unique features of the facility

  • The building is strategically situated to avoid shading of the solar panels
  • Its multipurpose hall and cafeteria are a hub for collaboration and learning
  • Sports a courtyard with low-maintenance native plants
  • The interior is significantly cooler than the surrounding harsh climate
  • The top facade of the courtyard is also covered with plants, boosting sustainability

The Kalyon Karapınar Solar Power Plant reminds us of the importance of integrating holistic and sustainable spaces into advanced renewable energy facilities. This unique and innovative facility brings the entire country, as well as Asia and Europe, one step closer to a more eco-friendly, sustainable power capacity. However, Asia has proven its dedication to remaining on top, especially as this Asian country has revealed the mother of all renewable plants. Competition is tough; thankfully, there is a bigger picture to keep in mind.

Disclaimer: Our coverage of events affecting companies is purely informative and descriptive. Under no circumstances does it seek to promote an opinion or create a trend, nor can it be taken as investment advice or a recommendation of any kind

Pages