July 16, 2025: The Water Cost of Electricity on the Susquehanna River

May 15, 2025: Data Centers and Nuclear Power on the Susquehanna River: More Questions than Answers

Sep 29, 2024: The case against restarting Three Mile Island’s Unit-1


Radioactive: The Women of Three Mile Island

Did you catch "The Meltdown: Three Mile Island" on Netflix?
TMI remains a danger and TMIA is working hard to ensure the safety of our communities and the surrounding areas.
Learn more on this site and support our efforts. Join TMIA. To contact the TMIA office, call 717-233-7897.

    

April 16, 2026

NUCLEAR SAFETY | VOLUNTEER | PROGRAMS | DONATE | SUBSCRIBE 

THANK YOU FOR READING AND SHARING WITH YOUR NETWORK

Opinion: Reprocessing isn’t the solution for San Onofre’s nuclear waste

In an op-ed published in The Coast News, the Samuel Lawrence Foundation made the case that reprocessing isn’t a solution for San Onofre's 3.6 million pounds of nuclear waste. The U.S. halted commercial reprocessing decades ago after India used plutonium from its civilian program to build a nuclear bomb, and experts say newer methods don't meaningfully reduce that risk. San Diego County looked into the idea and reached the same conclusion, calling reprocessing cost-prohibitive and not a strategically viable path forward. Instead of chasing unproven technology, lawmakers should establish an independent nuclear waste authority to prioritize removing waste from high-risk sites like San Onofre.

READ OUR OP-ED

How the War in Iran is Impacting 

Energy Security

Two weeks ago, the U.S. and Israel initiated unprecedented military action against Iran. In addition to the human toll, the war sends shocks through the global economy, affecting fertilizer, food, and fuel supplies. The conflict also spotlights nuclear in 2 key ways:



  1. Energy takes center stage. Fuel costs soar, electricity bills rise, and war erodes supply chains once thought secure. The chaos of energy markets has forced a reckoning, with some leaders turning to nuclear power to prevent future shocks. But two narratives around nuclear diverge sharply on the evidence. Restarting decommissioned reactors, when safe and economical, can leverage existing infrastructure and come back online in the time it takes to inspect and upgrade them. New nuclear—especially small modular reactors using more exotic fuel types—has yet to match the cost reductions of existing renewables or the advances of technologies like geothermal and fusion. Leaders building a resilient, cost-effective grid should prioritize what works first, and what has taken the largest steps forward next.
  2. Nuclear power plants remain a uniquely vulnerable security concern. Multiple attacks on Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant have sparked serious safety concerns. Strikes on a reactor or storage pools could trigger a regional disaster: releasing radiation, prompting evacuations beyond Iran's borders, and contaminating food, soil, and water for decades. The International Atomic Energy Agency warns that hits to nearby buildings alone could damage vital safety equipment.

Diablo Canyon Power Plant’s License Gets a 20-Year Federal Extension

The federal government approved a license extension for California's last nuclear plant, Diablo Canyon, through 2045; but state legislative approval is still required to keep the plant operating past 2030. Climate experts argue that money would be far better spent on renewables and battery storage. In the San Diego Union-Tribune, our Policy Director Peter Jones flagged another concern: safety reviews were waived to fast-track the renewal. "Short-circuiting that is just irresponsible," he said. A new report also claims PG&E inflated costs when asking taxpayers for a $1.4 billion loan to keep the plant open.

READ THE ARTICLE

Action on California Nuclear Legislation

Good news first: a bill allowing "microreactors" to be built in California was voted down in committee. SLF signed onto an opposition letter, and we thank everyone who showed up and spoke out!

 

The bigger battle is AB 2647. This bill would effectively remove the requirement that licensing for new nuclear reactors are paired with a permanent waste solution. This could open the door to "advanced" reactors and large conventional reactors like the one that caused massive cost overruns and ratepayer increases in Georgia, coming in at $35 billion (more than double the $14 billion estimate). In light of the federal government's reduction of nuclear safety measures, any legislation on nuclear reactors must ensure a reasonable floor of public health protections. The vote is coming this Monday, April 20. 

STAY UPDATED

Volunteer with us for Earth Month!

This year, the Samuel Lawrence Foundation is tabling at Earth Day events across San Diego — come say hello! We are using this opportunity to bring greater awareness to the 3.6 million pounds of waste at San Onofre, one conversation at a time. If you are interested in getting more involved, sign up to volunteer. We’ll teach you the ropes, just bring your energy :)

 

Events:

  • April 18th (11am - 3pm): South Bay Earth Day | Chula Vista Bayfront Park
  • April 18th (10pm - 4pm ): Alta Vista Botanical Garden | Vista
  • April 22nd (11am - 5pm): UCSD Earth Day | Sun God Lawn
REGISTER TO VOLUNTEER

Yes, In My Backyard? States Express Interest in Handling Nuclear Waste

The deadline has passed for states to respond to the federal government’s request for Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses–an initiative to build an end-to-end nuclear fuel cycle, waste disposal included. Utah, Tennessee, South Carolina, Washington, and Colorado have all expressed interest. States can choose some of the nuclear waste activities they want to administer with their own tailored-made programs: uranium mining, enrichment, and fuel fabrication can be co-administered by the state, but hosting some form of nuclear waste disposal is the price of admission. We support the government’s focus on solving the nuclear waste issue, and while any further announcements aren't expected for months, we will be tracking this closely.

Inside the Dismantling of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ProPublica's latest investigation details the specific mechanisms behind recent Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) deregulation. It traces how DOGE operatives with no nuclear background were inserted into the agency to fast-track safety regulation overhauls. The agency has downsized by over 400 staff since Trump took office. Most notably, the article explores the effects of the executive orders which scrapped longstanding radiation standards requiring exposures to be kept as low as reasonably achievable. Instead of acting as an independent office, the NRC now directly reports to the President’s Office of Management and Budget with all new rules routed through the Office's Director, Russell Vought. It's a detailed, well-reported piece that is essential reading for anyone following the deregulation story.

READ THE FULL INVESTIGATION

Air Quality Monitors to Nepal's Himalayan Climate Institute

SLF Board Member Charles Ziegler traveled to Nepal and India to meet with the Kathmandu Institute of Applied Sciences. To support the organization’s research and teaching, SLF provided six AirGradient monitors that will establish air quality baselines indoors and outdoors and contribute to an open-source, global monitoring database. The day after Charles departed, the Institute’s CEO, Basant Giri, appeared on National Nepal Television to describe the monitors and announce expanded climate research. 



The Institute also focuses on training the next generation of climate scientists in the Himalayas, which is critical as Nepal is the fourth most vulnerable country to the effects of climate change. Nepal's new prime minister, Belendra Shah, is 35, making him the youngest to take on the position. He has prioritized climate action and knows it will take his generation–along with the students at the Institute--to confront what climate change is already doing to this region.

How We Remember Disaster: 

40 Years Since Chernobyl

April 26, 2026 marks 40 years since the worst nuclear disaster in history. The 1986 meltdown and explosion at Chernobyl released radiation across Europe, forced the permanent evacuation of nearly 350,000 people, directly resulted in over 4,000 deaths, and left an exclusion zone that remains uninhabitable to this day. The full health toll is still unfolding, and the surrounding forest is forever changed. 

 

To commemorate this history, SLF is a proud supporting organizer of the 2nd International Uranium Film Festival in Chicago. The festival will run from April 24–26 at DePaul University's Lincoln Park Campus and will be free and open to the public. To promote awareness on risk and sustainability, the festival will feature films on nuclear weapons, waste, uranium mining, and the communities most impacted by the Nuclear Age. There will be a special showing of Chernobyl: The Lost Tapes, Atomic Bamboozle, and Silent Fallout - Baby Teeth Speak. If you're in the area, come out and bring a friend, or share with others. 

SEE THE FULL PROGRAM

The Community That Gave Everything for Nuclear Is Asked to Give More

Piketon, Ohio, sits on the site of a former uranium enrichment plant that spent decades contaminating the surrounding community, its groundwater, and soil with radioactivity. Piketon's cancer rates are 44% above the national average, and in 2019 was forced to close a middle school after radioactive material was detected with air monitoring. The federal government has never compensated residents, despite acknowledging the high contamination levels. Cleanup is nowhere near complete. 

 

Now Piketon is being sited for a $33 billion gas megasite, a 10-gigawatt AI data center, nuclear reactors from the startup Oklo, and expanded uranium enrichment.  Public safety and emergency plans have yet to be disclosed. In this rural town of 28,000, jobs are needed, but at what cost? Piketon cannot be asked to absorb the potential expense, pollution, and long-term risk while its community is still overdue for a cleanup that started 35 years ago.

READ THE ARTICLE

Upcoming Events

April 20: Goldman Environmental Prize

The Goldman Prize recognizes grassroots environmental champions for significant efforts to protect and restore the natural environment. Livestream here

 

April 22: Kim McCoy at the Belly Up

Join us at the Belly Up Tavern from 6-8 PM PT to hear oceanographer Kim McCoy discuss the Powers that Clash at the Pacific Coast. Seats are limited, so register here! If you can't make it in person, register for Zoom.

 

April 23: Bill MicKibben Coming to San Diego

Dedicated climate activist and author will be speaking at UC San Diego on April 23 at 6:00 PM. The talk will explore climate, faith, and collective responsibility. 

This new Dept of Energy Inspector General's  report is useful for showing how DOE Nuclear Energy mismanaged the NuScale project, as well as other projects.  Our taxpayer money wasted again!

Audit of DOE Nuclear Energy contract for NuScale shows mismanagement.

https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2026-03/DOE-OIG-26-25.pdf

Donna Gilmore

Hello:
 

The Price-Anderson Act provides compensation for offsite damages from a nuclear plant release of radioactivity. Kinda. Sorta.
 
When a nuclear plant is operating, up to nearly $16 billion is available for harm caused by radioactivity released from a reactor core, its spent fuel pool, or an onsite ISFSI.
 
This liability protection consists of private insurance (currently at $500 million) purchased by the plant owner supplemented, if necessary, by funds collected from the owners of other operating nuclear plants. 
 
When a nuclear plant permanently shuts down, the NRC approves exemptions from the Price-Anderson insurance coverages. In November 2023, the NRC approved an exemption for Indian Point reducing its private insurance level to $100 million and dropping the site from the supplemental pool.
 
The NRC's "logic" for the exemptions is that the risk of an accident at an ISFSI is very, very, very low. Perhaps. But is the risk of a terrorist act at an ISFSI of a permanently shut down plant equally low? The NRC's "analysis" did not consider terrorist acts. And the force-on-force tests of security at operating plants is terminated once a plant permanently shuts down.
 
To be fair, nuclear security is quite good. No nuclear plant or dry cask has ever been stolen (as far as we know). 
 
But a terrorist act at the Indian Point ISFSI were to cause more than $100 million in offsite damages, who would provide the compensation?  Who? And how?
 
Perhaps the Stafford Act would fill in for the AWOL Price-Anderson Act. All it would take is an act by the federal government (you know, the folks who have been shut down the past few weeks because of their inability to reach agreement on a budget) to invoke the act. 
 
The NRC's assumption that a terrorist attack on an ISFSI at a permanently shut down nuclear plant should be backed, at least, by their conducting force-on-force tests of the untested security they are relying so much on to protect Americans. 
 
In the force-on-force tests conducted at operating reactors, the mock bad guys "win" a small percentage of the time (about 4 to 5 percent.) That's good. It shows the tests don't ask simply questions like "Who's buried in Grant's Tomb" and accept "Dead people" as a correct answer. The losses allow security weaknesses to be remedied before real bad guys can exploit them. Force-on-force tests are essential in determining that security is sufficient and identifying gaps needing to be closed. 
 
Thanks,
Dave Lochbaum
 

 SUN DAY CAMPAIGN

(a campaign for a sustainable energy future)
8606 Greenwood Avenue, #2; Takoma Park, MD 20912-6656

 
follow on BlueSky at: @sun-day-campaign.bsky.social
 
         

       
April 9, 2026       
       
To:  Members, SUN DAY Campaign       
       
From: Ken Bossong       
       
Attached as a word document please find a compilation of news story "excerpts" issued by the SUN DAY Campaign between January 1 and March 31, 2026.       
       
These "excerpts" provide short reviews of new reports and studies on sustainable energy and climate change issues. If you are on the mailing list for SUN DAY’s bi-weekly compilation of news story excerpts, you may have received this information earlier.      
     
Approximately 250 news story "excerpts" are provided in the 63-page compilation.       
       
They are listed in chronological order within each of 10 different categories (e.g., solar, wind, climate change).       
       
You may find this information of use if you are preparing any reports, news releases, testimony, letters-to-the-editor, etc.       
       
 
NOTE: A similar set of news story “excerpts” for the second quarter of 2026 may be sent to you sometime in early July 2026. 
 

https://www.counterpunch.org/2026/04/09/nrc-asked-to-reclassify-uranium-mine-waste/
 

APRIL 9, 2026

NRC Asked to to Reclassify Uranium Mine Waste

LYNDA WILLIAMS

Newly released documents in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) public ADAMS database show that DISATechnologies is seeking federal approval to classify uranium mine waste processed through its HPSA system as “equivalent feed” without a new license application, environmental review or public comment. If approved, that material could be sold to the White Mesa Mill and processed into yellowcake for nuclear fuel, fundamentally changing the scope of the original NRC license granted for cleanup of abandoned uranium mines.

DISA’s High-Pressure Slurry Ablation (HPSA) system uses high-pressure water to break apart contaminated waste rock, separating it into a uranium-rich fraction—”fines”—while the majority of the bulk waste remains on site. An EPA-commissioned study by Tetra Tech was limited, running the system in short-duration cycles—minutes, not continuous operation—and at relatively small scale. The study showed that the remaining coarse material left onsite did not meet Navajo Nation cleanup standards.

Opponents argue that since HPSA cannot meet Navajo Nation cleanup standards, it constitutes uranium extraction — and therefore violates the Diné Natural Resources Protection Act of 2005, which prohibits uranium mining on Navajo land. Nevertheless, Navajo Nation EPA Executive Director Stephen Etsitty, who has been promoting the project, told the Gallup Independent on November 29, 2025: “You just need to scoop it up, you don’t need to mine it. It’s not mining. It’s all remediation.”

Infographic courtesy of Dooda Disa.

The NRC record tells a different story.

In 2025, the NRC published an Environmental Assessment and within weeks issued a Finding of No Significant Impact, allowing the agency to avoid preparing a full Environmental Impact Statement. Shortly afterward, the NRC approved a generic, multi-state license authorizing use of the system as a remediation technology, not for commercial uranium production, with site-specific verification required before operation.

On February 12, 2026, DISA’s Chief Regulatory Affairs Officer Stephen Cohen asked the NRC to classify HPSA fines as “equivalent feed,” which would allow them to be sold to the White Mesa Mill and processed into yellowcake for nuclear fuel. On March 19, NRC project manager Priya Yadav responded in the same NRC correspondence that DISA would need to demonstrate that the material contains no chemical additives and is essentially identical to natural ore.

In its March 23 filing, DISA states that HPSA uses “no chemicals to accomplish the separation,” but then discloses two industrial additives: a surfactant (DUSTREAT DC6109) applied to ore before processing and a polyacrylamide flocculant (Superfloc A-100) added to process water to settle uranium-bearing fines. Both carry safety warnings for hazardous components linked to cancer risk—including formaldehyde and acrylamide—and both safety data sheets explicitly caution against release into the environment. The filing describes the process generating contaminated process water planned to be sprayed back onto the mine site—conditions not evaluated in the original environmental review.

The same NRC filing includes a letter from Buu Nygren, President of the Navajo Nation, urging the NRC to act quickly so that “the verification test at Church Rock can proceed in 2026,” referring to the Old Church Rock Mine. The letter reveals that the Navajo Nation EPA has already entered into a formal agreement with DISA to conduct a Time Critical Removal Action (TCRA) at the site. Nygren describes the equivalent feed classification as “critical to my Safer, Sooner strategy,” warning that without it “our verification study cannot proceed” and recoverable uranium will be “lost to the fuel cycle.” The terms of the agreement between the Navajo Nation EPA and DISA — including who receives revenue from the sale of uranium-rich fines to the White Mesa Mill — have not been made public. If the NRC denies the classification, DISA would not be able to sell the fines for milling and would instead have to dispose of them at a licensed waste facility or leave the material on site and cap it.

On April 1, the NRC responded again in its correspondence, requiring DISA to provide data from operation of the full HPSA process—including the use of additives—to determine whether chemical residues remain in the final material. The NRC stated that DISA must: “demonstrate that the material resulting from the HPSA process is essentially the same as natural uranium ore and does not contain residual chemicals or contaminants that would affect its acceptability as mill feed.”

Letter from Navajo Nation President Dr. Buu Nygren to NRC Chairman Ho K. Nieh, March 18, 2026, included in DISA’s NRC filing.

If approved, uranium concentrated from mine waste under a license issued for remediation would be treated as natural ore and enter commercial nuclear fuel production without public environmental or license review.

Located near Blanding, Utah, adjacent to the White Mesa Ute tribe, the White Mesa Mill is the only operating uranium mill in the United States and is owned by Energy Fuels, a Canadian mining company. Energy Fuels also owns and operates the Pinyon Plains Uranium Mine in Arizona and is currently pursuing permits for the Roca Honda Uranium Mine in New Mexico. If the NRC approves the equivalent feed classification, it would set a precedent that could allow HPSA technology to be deployed at future mine sites, processing waste rock on-site and extracting every last ounce of uranium before leaving the radioactive waste behind.

Lynda Williams is a physicist and environmental activist living in Hawaii. She can be found at scientainment.com and on Bluesky @lyndalovon.bksy.social


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vpa5fNFTcNI&authuser=1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlIYHju4qRk&authuser=1

California’s nuclear plant gets 20-year extension from federal regulators

The decision extends the life of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, which has operated since 1985.
 
Avatar of Noah Baustin
By: 

 | 04/03/2026 06:33 AM EDT

Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2.

The Diablo Canyon Power Plant sits on California's Central Coast.Pacific Gas and Electric

ENERGYWIRE | Federal officials on Thursday approved a 20-year extension for California’s only nuclear power plant, capping a remarkable turnaround for a facility that was previously slated to retire and bolstering the ongoing resurgence of American nuclear energy.
What happened: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Acting Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Jeremy Groom signed off on Pacific Gas & Electric’s license renewal application to extend operations of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant through 2045. That opens the door to the plant staying open for another two decades, but to do so, it will also need permission from the state, which has so far only authorized operations through 2030.

 
 
 
“As California advances its clean energy and reliability goals, Diablo Canyon remains a stabilizing force on a dynamic grid,” Groom said during the signing ceremony. “It provides a steady source of carbon-free power during a period of rapid transition, supporting climate objectives while ensuring that the lights stay on in homes and businesses across the state.”
Why it matters: The NRC decision sets the stage for a major debate in the California Legislature over whether to extend the state's current permissions for the plant. The contours of that conversation, which have largely focused on grid reliability and energy affordability, illustrate how dramatically views of nuclear power have shifted in recent years.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has thus far refrained from taking a position on whether to keep the plant open beyond 2030, released a statement celebrating the decision.
“Today, I welcome the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's approval as we continue California's clean energy transition, creating good-paying jobs, fighting climate change and cementing the Golden State as a global powerhouse,” Newsom said.
PG&E leadership, meanwhile, was ecstatic about the signing.
“I am so excited my heart is just going to pop out of my chest,” PG&E Chief Nuclear Officer Paula Gerfen said at the event. “With all the distractions that we’ve had, the near closure of the station, then the turnaround in 2022, this team … stayed focused and ran the units safely, reliably and affordably through almost a decade of noise.”
Context: In 2016, PG&E signed an agreement with environmental and labor groups to retire Diablo Canyon by 2025, when its NRC license expired, and replace its electricity production with renewables and energy storage. At that time, global concern sparked by the 2011 leaks at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant loomed large over Diablo Canyon, as did California’s growing renewable energy generation requirements.
But in 2020, rolling blackouts exposed the vulnerabilities of the California grid, and a 2022 heat wave strained the system to the brink. That year, Newsom led a successful effort to extend Diablo Canyon to 2030 to shore up the electricity supply.
PG&E needed permission from the NRC to continue operating through 2030. But instead of applying for a five-year period, the company applied for a 20-year extension, the maximum that the NRC grants.
As the utility collected its state-level permits to extend operations during the past year, some lawmakers signaled an appetite to keep Diablo Canyon online beyond 2030. That included the influential chair of the Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee, Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris, who told POLITICO that the state will need Diablo Canyon to meet soaring electricity demands.
At the Thursday signing, John Grubb, interim president of the Bay Area Council, a business interest group, signaled that his organization will fight for an extension.
“The next step is securing long-term, durable support from the state of California, so that this facility can operate with certainty through 2045, and beyond,” Grubb said. “The Bay Area Council will be actively working with state leaders this year to ensure that Diablo Canyon remains part of California's energy future.”
But some legislative leaders have been hesitant to embrace an extension in light of concerns that the 2022 agreement turned out to be a bad deal for the state, especially given that taxpayers may end up footing a significant portion of the $1.4 billion loan California gave PG&E.
Multiple environmental groups are also working to stop Diablo Canyon’s march toward an extension by challenging its water permits.
Linda Seeley, vice president of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, a nuclear-critical environmental group, said that she opposed the NRC extension due to the facility’s large price tag and safety concerns stemming from Diablo Canyon’s proximity to earthquake faults.
The NRC signoff Thursday “lands us right back with our state legislature to turn around the unwise, foolish, expensive, unneeded Diablo Canyon,” Seeley said.
Background: Meanwhile, a growing coalition of business leaders, public officials and some environmentalists across the nation are backing nuclear energy as a means to power the electricity-hungry artificial intelligence boom.
President Donald Trump has been reshaping the NRC with the goal of quadrupling nuclear power by 2050, but even some of his Democratic antagonists wish he was doing more to push the power source forward. The Diablo Canyon approval represents the 100th renewed operating license for nuclear power plants issued by the NRC, according to Groom.
What’s next: With the NRC permission in hand, PG&E now has the regulatory signoffs it needs to operate Diablo Canyon through 2030. The company’s CEO has called on the California Legislature to act this year if lawmakers want to extend its lifetime beyond then.

The Trump Administration Is Doing Something Horrifying to Workers at Nuclear Facilities

Joe Wilkins, Wed, 1 April 2026
 
It isn’t just the guys handling plutonium who need to worry about radiation — every US nuclear worker, from the plumbers patching leaks to the janitors mopping floors, has a reason to be on guard.
 
New reporting by High Country News detailed the startling impact the Trump administration is having on the safety of nuclear energy workers.  As part of the administration’s “nuclear renaissance,” the US Department of Energy (DOE) has begun stripping back effective safety regulations that had previously limited workers’ exposure to deadly radiation.
 
“They’re pulling away from what’s kept us safe all these years,” Bradley Clawson, a former nuclear energy worker at Idaho National Laboratory, told HCN.  “In the long run it helped us as workers.  It was keeping us from getting a higher dose.”
 
Following four executive orders aimed at nuclear deregulation, both the DOE and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) have taken an increasingly lax view of safety at both federal nuclear projects like labs and cleanup sites, as well as commercial energy facilities.  Under Trump, these agencies no longer seem to operate on the long-held assumption that even a small amount of radiation exposure is bad for human health.  Instead, speed is the name of the game.
 
The language in one May 2025 executive order makes its deregulatory intent clear in no uncertain terms: “In particular, the NRC shall reconsider reliance on the linear no-threshold (LNT) model for radiation exposure and the ‘as low as reasonably achievable’ standard, which is predicated on LNT,” the order read.
 
At Los Alamos National Laboratory, for example, non-nuclear workers like plumbers and metalworkers are exposed to some amount of radiation, but as HCN notes, the Trump administration has forced the site to double its annual output of nuclear cores.
 
In a scathing letter to various government administrators, a group of organizations made up of doctors, environmental activists, and researchers called the safety rollbacks a “deliberate subversion of science and public health in favor of corporate interests.”
 
“Accepting weaker radiation protections amounts to accepting an ever-increasing level of avoidable human disease and suffering,” the letter continues.
 
The deregulations come as nuclear facilities across the US face a growing shortage of trained and experienced staff — an issue Trump admin energy department layoffs hasn’t exactly helped, and which is in direct contradiction with the White House’s stated goal of jumpstarting America’s nuclear energy capacity.
 
Facing lagging staff numbers but a rapidly changing nuclear energy landscape, many facilities have to turned to third-party contractors in order to keep up.  The result, critics say, is a breakdown in long-term safety culture as contractors move from site to site.  One prime example of this came in October, when a contractor at Michigan’s Palisade Power Plant fell into a reactor cavity.

Pages